From the TIKC Advisory Team · Federal Contracting News
One CUI Standard for the Whole Government: The New FAR Rule and Its 72-Hour Clock
A proposed FAR rule would standardize how all contractors handle Controlled Unclassified Information — with 72-hour incident reporting and real False Claims Act exposure.

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Cybersecurity requirements for contractors have been a patchwork — DoD had CMMC, GSA rolled out its own framework, and agencies improvised. Now the government is trying to set one standard for everyone. On June 23, 2026, the FAR Council proposed a rule — part of the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul — establishing governmentwide obligations for handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and reporting CUI incidents.
What the Rule Does
The proposed rule moves CUI requirements into the new FAR Part 40 framework, implemented through a new provision (FAR 52.240-6, Notice of CUI Requirements) and clause (FAR 52.240-7, Controlled Unclassified Information). For contractors, two obligations stand out: your information systems that handle CUI must meet the NIST security standard, and you must report any CUI incident within 72 hours of discovery.
Why This Reaches Almost Everyone
CUI isn’t just defense secrets. It includes personally identifiable information, procurement-sensitive and source-selection data, and proprietary information held on the government’s behalf — categories that touch a huge share of federal contracts. DOJ has recovered more than $80 million in cybersecurity-related False Claims Act settlements since October 2021. Getting CUI wrong isn’t just a security problem — it’s a false-claims exposure.
What to Do Now
- Know where your CUI lives. Map which systems store, process, or transmit CUI — you can’t protect what you can’t see.
- Align to the NIST standard now, not when a solicitation forces it; the same baseline underpins CMMC and the GSA framework.
- Build a 72-hour incident-reporting process — who detects, who decides, who reports — before you ever need it.
- Keep your representations accurate. With DOJ active, an inaccurate security attestation is a real liability.
The direction is unmistakable: one CUI standard, enforced harder. The firms that build the muscle now won’t scramble when the clause lands in their next award. Brick by brick.
FAQ
Is this the same thing as CMMC?
Related but not identical. CMMC is DoD’s verification mechanism (currently on pause at Phase 2); this FAR rule sets governmentwide CUI handling and reporting obligations. Both build on the same NIST standard.
Is the rule final?
No — it’s a proposed rule with a public comment period that closed July 23, 2026. Expect a final rule to follow, so preparing now is prudent.
Sources
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. (2026, June 25). Proposed rule on CUI and CUI incident reporting would create new requirements and risks for contractors.
Wiley Rein LLP. (2026, July). FAR Council proposes revised CUI framework as part of Revolutionary FAR Overhaul.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder & CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale — brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

One Faked Test Cost a Navy Supplier $10.9 Million
A company that makes steel for Navy ships let a tester change results so weak steel looked like it passed. It is paying about $10.9…

When Competitors Become Co-Conspirators: Bid Rigging and Collusion
A quiet word with a competitor about who wins which job feels like cooperation. It is a federal antitrust crime. Bid rigging and collusion carry…

The Set-Aside That Was Performed by the Wrong Company. A $4.8 Million Lesson.
A federal IT contractor and its owner agreed to pay $4.8 million after allegedly paying fees to 8(a) firms to win set-aside work, then doing…

The Cover-Up That Is Worse Than the Problem: Obstruction and Altering Records
When an audit or investigation looms, the instinct to clean up a file is a catastrophic one. Deleting an email or backdating a document can…

The Official Who Approved His Own Payday. A Conflict-of-Interest Indictment.
A government contracting official was charged after allegedly approving invoices that funneled money back to a side business he profited from, aided by a contractor…

The Case You Never See Coming: The FCA Seal, First-to-File, and the Disclosure Bar
A whistleblower suit can sit under court seal for years while the government investigates you in secret. Understanding the seal, the first-to-file rule, and the…

Winning on a Promise You Cannot Keep: Fraud in the Inducement
Overstate your staff, your experience, or your capabilities to win the award, and you can poison the entire contract. Fraud in the inducement means the…

The Loyalty You Owe: Honest Services Fraud and the Hidden Conflict
You can commit a federal crime without stealing a dollar. Honest services fraud punishes the person who secretly sells out the loyalty they owe, through…

$377 Million for the Costs It Should Not Have Billed. A Mischarging Lesson.
A major contractor agreed to pay $377 million, one of the largest procurement fraud settlements ever, over how it billed indirect costs to the government…
The Chip That Was Not Real: Counterfeit Electronic Parts and Your Duty to Catch Them
A single counterfeit microchip in a defense system can cost lives and end a company. For many contractors, the law does not just punish knowingly…

Signing for Your Code: The Secure Software Development Self-Attestation
If you sell software to the government, a senior executive now has to personally attest that it was built following secure development practices. That signature…

The NDA Clause That Can Void Your Contract: The Anti-Gag Rule
That confidentiality agreement your employees sign may quietly break federal law. The anti-gag rule bars contractors from using NDAs that stop employees from reporting fraud…




