From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
Defective Pricing: The Cost-Data Duty That Turns a Good Deal Into a Refund
On negotiated contracts, the Truth in Negotiations Act requires accurate, complete, and current cost data. Get it wrong and the government claws back the overpayment…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
When you negotiate a price with the government without real competition, you take on a duty most commercial businesses never face: to open your books, hand over your cost data, and make sure it’s accurate, complete, and current. Fall short and the deal you thought you closed can turn into a refund. That’s the world of the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) — now formally the “Truthful Cost or Pricing Data” statute (41 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3509) — and its enforcement mechanism, defective pricing.
What TINA actually requires
For certain negotiated contracts and modifications above the threshold (generally $2 million), and where no exception applies — such as adequate price competition or a commercial product or service — you must submit certified cost or pricing data and certify that it is accurate, complete, and current as of the date you reached agreement on price (FAR 15.403). The idea is simple: without competition to discipline the price, the government wants the same facts you have so it can negotiate fairly.
How “defective pricing” happens
If the data you certified turns out not to have been accurate, complete, or current — and the government relied on it and agreed to a higher price than it otherwise would have — the contract is “defectively priced.” The government is entitled to a price reduction to recover the overpayment, plus interest, and where the defect was knowing, potential penalties and even False Claims Act exposure (DCAA guidance, 2026). The classic traps aren’t exotic: using stale vendor quotes, failing to disclose a discount you’d just secured, or leaving out data your estimators had in hand.
Why growing small businesses need to care
TINA feels like a big-contractor problem — until you win your first large sole-source or follow-on award. 8(a) sole-source deals, non-competitive modifications, and negotiated task orders can all cross the threshold and trigger the certification. The moment you’re pricing without competition above the threshold, the cost-data duty is yours.
What to do now
- Know your threshold and exceptions. Confirm early whether certified cost or pricing data is required, or whether an exception (competition, commerciality) applies.
- Run a “sweep” before agreement. Right before you shake hands on price, refresh your data — new quotes, new discounts, new rates — and disclose it.
- Disclose completely. When in doubt, hand it over; omissions are what create defective-pricing liability.
- Keep records of exactly what data you submitted and when, so you can prove your certification was true as of the agreement date.
Certified pricing isn’t a formality — it’s a promise the government can audit for years. Make the promise one you can keep. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What is defective pricing?
Submitting certified cost or pricing data under TINA that was not accurate, complete, or current, which caused the government to agree to an inflated price — entitling the government to a price reduction.
When does TINA apply?
Generally to negotiated contracts and modifications above the $2 million threshold when no exception (like adequate price competition or a commercial item) applies (FAR 15.403).
What’s the penalty for getting it wrong?
A price reduction to recover the overpayment plus interest; where the defect was knowing, penalties and potential False Claims Act liability can follow.
How do I avoid it?
Confirm whether certified data is required, sweep for the most current data right before agreeing on price, disclose fully, and keep records proving what you submitted and when.
Sources
Defense Contract Audit Agency. (2026). Defective pricing audit guidance.
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). 15.403, Obtaining certified cost or pricing data; 15.407-1, Defective certified cost or pricing data.
U.S. Code. (2026). Truthful Cost or Pricing Data, 41 U.S.C. §§ 3501–3509.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder & CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale — brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




