From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
The Audit That Comes Years Later: DCAA, Incurred Costs, and the Unallowable-Cost Trap
On cost-reimbursement and T&M work, DCAA can review your billed costs years after the fact. Charge an unallowable cost and the government wants it back…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
On a firm-fixed-price contract, your price is your price. But the moment you take cost-reimbursement or time-and-materials work, you invite the government to look inside your books, and it can do so years after you invoiced. The reviewer is the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), and the concept that trips up more small contractors than any other is the unallowable cost. Charge one and the government wants its money back. Charge one you knew was off limits and penalties, or worse, can follow.
What DCAA actually reviews
Contractors performing cost-type work generally submit an annual incurred cost proposal (often called the incurred cost submission) that reconciles what they billed to what they actually spent. DCAA tests those costs for three things: are they allowable under FAR Part 31, are they allocable to the contract, and are they reasonable. It also examines your accounting system, your indirect rates, and your compliance with contract terms. If billed costs exceed what the rules allow, you owe the difference back.
The unallowable-cost trap (FAR Part 31)
FAR Part 31 lists categories of cost the government simply will not pay for, even if they are legitimate business expenses. Common examples include entertainment, alcohol, most advertising and public relations, lobbying, bad debts, interest on borrowing, certain travel above federal per diem, contributions and donations, and fines and penalties. The point that surprises people: a cost can be perfectly normal for your business and still be unallowable to charge to the government. Your job is to identify those costs and keep them out of your billings and your indirect rate pools.
Expressly unallowable costs carry penalties
There is a sharper edge here. Certain costs are expressly unallowable, meaning a specific rule names them as unallowable. If you include an expressly unallowable cost in a proposal or billing, the government can assess a penalty on top of recovering the cost, and if you did it knowingly, you drift toward False Claims Act exposure. This is why a clean process for screening and segregating unallowable costs is not bookkeeping hygiene. It is legal protection.
What to do now
- Build an unallowable-cost screen into your accounting. Flag and segregate entertainment, alcohol, lobbying, penalties, and the rest so they never touch a government billing or an indirect pool.
- Keep your timekeeping and indirect rates clean. DCAA reviews how you allocate overhead and G&A, so your rate structure needs to be documented and consistent.
- File your incurred cost submission on time and keep the supporting records. Late or unsupported submissions invite scrutiny.
- Get help before your first cost-type award, not after. An accounting system that passes DCAA review is a prerequisite, not an afterthought.
Cost-type work can be a growth engine, but it comes with an open-book promise the government can call in years later. Keep the books clean the whole time and the audit is a formality instead of a crisis. Brick by brick.
FAQ
Does DCAA audit fixed-price contracts?
Generally the deep cost review applies to cost-reimbursement and time-and-materials work, where you bill actual costs. Firm-fixed-price contracts are far less exposed to incurred-cost auditing, though other reviews can still apply.
What is the difference between unallowable and expressly unallowable?
An unallowable cost is one the government will not reimburse. An expressly unallowable cost is one a specific rule names as unallowable, and including it can trigger a penalty in addition to repayment.
How far back can DCAA look?
Incurred cost reviews often happen well after the year in question, so records from several years back can be examined. Keep your cost documentation for the full retention period.
Do I need a special accounting system?
For cost-type work you generally need an accounting system that can segregate direct and indirect costs, exclude unallowable costs, and track costs by contract. Confirm adequacy before you take on cost-reimbursement awards.
Sources
Defense Contract Audit Agency. (2026). Information for contractors and incurred cost audit guidance.
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). Part 31, Contract cost principles and procedures; 42.709, Penalties for unallowable costs.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder and CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




