From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
CMMC Reform Is Underway: What DoD’s Listening Sessions Mean for Small Defense Contractors Right Now
DoD’s CMMC reform team held its first session July 16 after suspending Phase 2 certifications. Pentagon CIO Kirsten Davies is moving quickly — but questions…

Published August 11, 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
The Pentagon suspended CMMC Phase 2 third-party certifications in June and stood up a reform review team. That team held its first listening session on July 16. The Pentagon wants to move quickly with its review of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program, but plenty of questions swirl around what defense officials can do differently this time to balance compliance concerns for small businesses with the need to enforce cybersecurity requirements. Here is the current state of play and what small businesses must understand right now.
Where the CMMC Reform Stands
The suspension covers Phase 2 third-party assessments — the requirement for CMMC Level 2 certification through accredited C3PAO assessors. The suspension does not eliminate CMMC or its underlying cybersecurity requirements. The reform team is examining the cost and burden of third-party assessments on small businesses, the adequacy of CMMC Level 1 self-assessment as a compliance pathway, and whether the C3PAO ecosystem has the capacity to certify the volume of contractors DoD needs without creating a bottleneck.
What Has Not Changed
The CMMC Phase 2 suspension does not suspend DFARS 252.204-7012. Every contractor subject to that clause is still required to implement NIST SP 800-171 controls and maintain an accurate SPRS score. What it suspends is the timeline for requiring third-party C3PAO assessments — contractors cannot yet be required to obtain a CMMC Level 2 certification as a contract condition while the review is underway.
What Small Defense Contractors Should Do Right Now
Do not stop your NIST 800-171 implementation. The underlying cybersecurity controls — NIST SP 800-171’s 110 practices — are not going away. Contractors who use the suspension as a reason to pause implementation are making a strategic error: the SPRS score reflecting your 800-171 implementation is a legal document, and inaccurate scores remain an enforcement liability regardless of CMMC’s status.
Update your SPRS score if it does not reflect your actual posture. The SPRS self-assessment score is a certification of your cybersecurity posture. If your controls have improved or deteriorated since your last assessment, update the score. A score that materially understates or overstates your actual implementation is a compliance and legal risk.
Watch for Phase 2 restart timing. The reform review is expected to produce recommendations within 60 days of its July 16 start — meaning results could arrive in mid-September. Monitor DoD CIO communications and Federal Register notices for any rule changes.
The Bottom Line
CMMC is being reformed, not eliminated. The core cybersecurity requirements are unchanged. Use this window to get your NIST 800-171 implementation solid, your SPRS score accurate, and your documentation in order. When Phase 2 restarts, contractors who used the pause wisely will be ahead of those who treated it as a reprieve. Brick by brick — cyber compliance is not optional, and the reform will not make it easier, only more structured.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the CMMC Phase 2 suspension actually suspend?
The suspension paused the requirement for contractors to obtain CMMC Level 2 certification through accredited C3PAO third-party assessors as a contract condition. It did not suspend DFARS 252.204-7012, NIST SP 800-171 implementation requirements, or SPRS self-assessment obligations.
Do I still need to maintain my SPRS score during the suspension?
Yes. The SPRS score is a self-certification of your cybersecurity posture under DFARS 252.204-7012, which remains fully in force. An inaccurate SPRS score is a False Claims Act exposure regardless of CMMC’s Phase 2 status.
When will CMMC Phase 2 restart?
The reform review team began work July 16 and is expected to produce recommendations within approximately 60 days — suggesting mid-September 2026. The restart timeline and any modifications will be announced through DoD CIO communications and potentially a Federal Register rule change.
References
Federal News Network. (2026, July 30). DoD Plans CMMC Listening Sessions As Questions Swirl Around Review. https://federalnewsnetwork.com/defense-main/2026/07/dod-plans-cmmc-listening-sessions-as-questions-swirl-around-review/
About the Author
Melanie Patterson
Founder & CEO of Team Integrity Knowledge Center and creator of GovCon iSource. Former nurse turned entrepreneur with over 10 years guiding small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses to over $10 million in government awards. Build, grow, scale — brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




