From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
The Wage Rules for Service Work: The Service Contract Act Explained
If you hold a federal service contract, with janitors, guards, call-center staff, or maintenance crews, the Service Contract Act sets what you must pay them…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Construction has its wage law, and so does service work. If you hold a federal service contract, staffing a help desk, cleaning a building, guarding a gate, running a cafeteria, or maintaining equipment, the Service Contract Act decides a big part of what you pay your people. Like its construction cousin, it sets a floor for wages and benefits, publishes it in a wage determination, and expects you to follow it to the letter. Pay below it, or put workers in the wrong category, and a labor shortfall quietly becomes a compliance problem.
What the Service Contract Act covers
The Service Contract Act, sometimes called the SCA or the McNamara-O’Hara Act, applies to most federal contracts over a dollar threshold whose main purpose is furnishing services through service employees. For covered work, the Department of Labor issues a wage determination listing the minimum hourly wage and the fringe benefit amount for each job classification. You must pay each service employee at least that wage and provide at least that level of benefits, or pay the difference in cash.
Where contractors slip
The mistakes mirror the ones on Davis-Bacon construction work. The first is classification: paying a worker as a lower-tier category when their actual duties fit a higher-paid one. The second is the fringe benefit obligation, which contractors underpay or miscount more often than the base wage. The third shows up at recompete time, when a new wage determination raises the rates and a contractor keeps paying the old ones. When you certify compliance you did not meet, that certification can become a false statement.
Why the fringe piece trips people up
The base wage is easy to see on a pay stub. The fringe benefit obligation is not, and that is where the shortfalls hide. The wage determination sets a dollar amount per hour you must provide in benefits like health insurance or retirement, or pay in cash if you do not. Contractors who offer skimpy benefits, or who forget to add up whether their benefits actually hit the required amount, end up underpaying without realizing it. The fix is arithmetic: add up what your benefits are worth per hour and make sure it meets the number on the determination.
What to do now
- Get the right wage determination. Find the SCA determination for your contract and location before you price the work.
- Classify to the real duties. Match each worker to the category that fits what they actually do.
- Do the fringe math. Confirm your benefits meet the required hourly amount, or pay the difference in cash.
- Watch recompetes and option years. Update to the new wage determination the moment it applies.
- Keep clean records. Document wages, classifications, and benefits so you can prove compliance.
The Service Contract Act is really a promise that the people doing the government’s service work get paid a fair local rate. Pull the right determination, classify honestly, and get the fringe math right, and you protect your workers and your contract at the same time. Treat the wage determination as the floor it is, and you stay clear of the trap. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What is the Service Contract Act?
A law requiring most federal service contracts over a dollar threshold to pay service employees at least the minimum wage and fringe benefits set by the Department of Labor in a wage determination for each job classification.
How is it different from Davis-Bacon?
Davis-Bacon covers construction labor; the Service Contract Act covers service work like custodial, security, food service, call centers, and maintenance. Both set prevailing wages and fringe benefits through wage determinations.
What is the most common SCA mistake?
Underpaying the fringe benefit obligation. The base wage is visible, but contractors often fail to confirm their benefits meet the required hourly amount, or do not pay the shortfall in cash.
What happens at a recompete?
A new wage determination often raises the required rates. Continuing to pay the old rates, then certifying compliance, can turn a wage shortfall into a false certification.
Sources
McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act, 41 U.S.C. 6701 et seq. (2026).
U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. (2026). Service Contract Act wage determinations and fringe benefit compliance.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
TIKC Staff Writer
Team Integrity Knowledge Center is a GovCon education and consulting platform helping small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses win and keep federal and state contracts with plain-English guidance. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

Do Your Share of the Work: The Limitations on Subcontracting Rule
When you win a small-business set-aside, the government expects your small business to actually do the work, not hand most of it to a big…

Paying the Prevailing Wage: The Davis-Bacon and Certified Payroll Trap
On federal construction, you do not get to decide what to pay your workers. The Davis-Bacon Act sets a prevailing wage, and every week you…

When the Auditor Walks the Floor: Surviving a DCAA Floor Check
One day, with no warning, a government auditor shows up and asks your people what they are working on and what contract they are charging…

Timecard Fraud Just Drove a $184 Million Settlement. Your Hours Are the New Target
In 2026, the fastest road to a giant False Claims Act bill is not a fake product or a phantom vendor. It is the timesheet…

The $400 Hammer Problem: Spare-Parts and Catalog Overpricing
The government buys a lot of spare parts, and overcharging for them is one of the oldest and most watched forms of contract abuse. Marking…

Loading the Front End: Why Unbalanced Bidding Can Backfire
You can win a job and still get your pricing wrong in a way that raises red flags. Front-loading early line items, or shifting price…

Pass the First One for Real: First Article Testing and the Approval Trap
On many contracts, before you can ship in volume, one sample has to pass first article testing. Certifying that the first article passed, or sending…

Follow Your Own Rules: Cost Accounting Compliance and Why Consistency Is the Law
Once you tell the government how you account for costs, you have to actually do it that way, every time, on every contract. Quietly shifting…

Warn Before the Money Runs Out: The Limitation of Cost and Funds Clauses
On a cost-type contract, you do not just keep working and billing when the budget is running low. You have a duty to warn the…

Asking for More, Honestly: Why a Padded Request for Equitable Adjustment Is Fraud
When the government changes the job, you have a right to ask for more money through a request for equitable adjustment. That is fair and…

In 2026, GovCon Enforcement Got Personal
Across 2026, one pattern keeps showing up in government contracting settlements: the government is naming the people, not just the companies. CEOs and presidents are…




