From the TIKC Advisory Team · Compliance & Regulatory Alerts
Doing Extra Work for Free? The Changes Clause and Getting Paid for It
The government can direct you to change the work mid-contract, and sometimes it changes the work without ever saying so. The Changes Clause entitles you…

Published 2026 | TIKC NewsWire
Federal contracts are not frozen in place. The government can direct you to change what you are doing within the general scope of the contract, and your contract has a Changes Clause that allows exactly that. The flip side is that when a change adds to your cost or time, you are entitled to an adjustment. The problem is that many contractors do the extra work, absorb the cost, and never ask to be paid, either because they did not realize a change happened or because they stayed quiet to keep the customer happy. That silence can cost you real money.
The two kinds of changes
There are two ways a change shows up. The obvious one is a formal, written change order from the contracting officer telling you to do something different. That one is easy to spot. The dangerous one is the constructive change: nobody issues a formal order, but the government does something, like adding a requirement, tightening an interpretation, or delaying your access, that effectively changes your work anyway. You feel the added cost even though no one called it a change. Both entitle you to an adjustment, but the constructive change is the one contractors miss.
Why contractors leave money on the table
Small contractors often eat the cost of changes for the wrong reasons. They want to look easy to work with. They assume asking for more money will hurt the relationship or future awards. Or they simply do not track the extra hours well enough to prove them. So they perform the added work, never request the adjustment, and quietly lose margin on the contract. The government is not obligated to volunteer money you did not ask for. The Changes Clause gives you the right to be paid, but you have to claim it.
Speak up, in writing, in time
The catch is timing. When a change adds cost or time, you generally need to notify the government and request an adjustment within the window your contract sets, not at the end of the job. Wait too long and you can lose the right to recover, even for work you clearly performed. And only the contracting officer can authorize a change. If someone else tells you to do extra work, that can be an unauthorized commitment you may not get paid for at all, so confirm who is actually directing the change.
What to do now
- Recognize a change when it happens. Watch for added requirements, new interpretations, or delays that quietly increase your work, not just formal change orders.
- Track the extra cost. Capture the added hours, materials, and time a change creates as it happens, not from memory later.
- Notify in writing, promptly. Tell the contracting officer about the impact and request an adjustment within your contract’s window.
- Confirm who is directing it. Make sure the person changing the work has the authority to bind the government.
- Do not just absorb it. Asking to be paid for a real change is normal business, not a threat to the relationship.
Flexibility is built into government contracts, and so is your right to be paid when the work grows. The contractors who lose margin are the ones who stay quiet and hope it balances out. Spot the change, document the cost, and request your adjustment in time, and the extra work becomes extra revenue instead of a gift you never meant to give. Brick by brick.
FAQ
What is the Changes Clause?
It is a standard contract clause that lets the government direct changes within the general scope of the work. When a change increases your cost or time, it also entitles you to an equitable adjustment to your price or schedule.
What is a constructive change?
It is a change that happens without a formal change order, when the government does something that effectively alters your work, like adding a requirement or delaying your access. It can entitle you to an adjustment just like a written change, but it is easy to miss.
Why might I lose the right to get paid?
Usually because of timing. If you do not notify the government and request an adjustment within the window your contract sets, you can forfeit recovery even for extra work you clearly performed.
Who can authorize a change?
Only the contracting officer can authorize a change that binds the government. If someone without that authority directs extra work, you may be facing an unauthorized commitment and may not be paid, so always confirm the source.
Sources
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). 52.243-1, Changes — Fixed-Price, and related Changes clauses.
Federal Acquisition Regulation. (2026). Subpart 43.2, Change Orders.
This article is general information, not legal advice.
About the Author
TIKC Staff Writer
Team Integrity Knowledge Center is a GovCon education and consulting platform helping small, women-owned, and minority-owned businesses win and keep federal and state contracts with plain-English guidance. Build, grow, scale, brick by brick. Contact
Your next step
Talk it through with a TIKC advisor
Continue reading
Related stories

When Your Costs Rise Mid-Contract: Economic Price Adjustment Clauses
A fixed-price contract can turn into a money-loser when material costs spike. An Economic Price Adjustment clause is the built-in tool that lets your price…

Personal Services and the Line a Contractor Cannot Cross
A contract can be legal to win but illegal to perform if the government ends up supervising your people like employees, or if you start…

Your Invoice Is a Legal Claim: Getting WAWF Right
On most defense contracts you bill through an electronic system called WAWF, and every invoice you submit is a formal claim for payment. A sloppy…
SBIR Data Rights: The Protection Most Small Innovators Give Away by Accident
If you win an SBIR or STTR award, the research you create comes with special data-rights protection the government does not get with most contracts…

The Government Just Told You to Stop. Now What?
A stop-work order can freeze your contract overnight, and what you do in the first few days decides whether you get paid for the disruption…

A $29.5 Million Reminder That Your Certifications Have to Be True
A major defense contractor just agreed to pay $29.5 million over allegations that it certified compliance with federal rules it was not actually following. The…
After a Merger, Are You Still a Small Business? The Recertification Rule
A merger or acquisition can cost you your small-business status overnight, and the rules make you report it. Keep running set-aside work as if nothing…

Technical Data Rights: How to Keep the Government From Giving Your Designs to a Competitor
When you deliver drawings, software, or technical data to the government, the markings you put on them decide who else can use them. Mark them…

Selling Your Company? The Government Has to Agree to Keep Your Contract
You cannot simply hand your federal contract to a buyer the way you would transfer a commercial deal. The government has to approve the transfer…

Earned Value Reporting: When Your Progress Numbers Become a Legal Statement
On big contracts you report how much work you have earned, not just how much you spent. Inflate that number to look on track and…

Expressly Unallowable Costs: When Billing the Wrong Expense Comes With a Penalty
Some costs are not just disallowed when you bill them to the government. They carry an automatic penalty on top, sometimes double. Here is what…




